Are You Better Off Than You Were Eight Years Ago?
This is an interesting question. Are you better off than you were eight years ago? Do you know anyone who is? Just wondering. Let me know in comments.
This is an interesting question. Are you better off than you were eight years ago? Do you know anyone who is? Just wondering. Let me know in comments.
Here is the full video of John McCain and Barack Obama’s first presidential debate…
What did you think? Who Won? Let me know in comments.
“I don’t torture myself over decisions. I make them as quickly as I can,
quicker than the other fellow if I can. Often my haste is a mistake,
but I live with the consequences without complaint.“— from “Worth Fighting For” by John McCain and Mark Salter, 2002
Is this the person who you want with the power to deploy US troops?
Is this the person who you want with the ability to launch a nuclear assault?
Is this the person who you want attempting to influence the US economy?
Are you willing to live with the consequence’s of John McCain’s quick decisions without complaint?
If I worked for the Obama campaign this would be the one quote that I would repeat in ads over and over and over again.
This widget is from VoteGopher…
•An interactive tool that provides users with issues-based coverage of the election in one
location
• Pick among 25 issues central to the election and explore side-by-side comparisons of the candidates
• Watch video breakdowns created by the VoteGopher team
• Begin our MyBallot feature and find your candidate
Here is a guest post by community member Deb Della Piana from Turn Left.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
It’s election season, and I’m not about to let up on the McCain-Palin ticket. If I put these two at the larval stage, I’m giving them too much credit. To show that I’m not just a one-issue voter when it comes to McCain and Palin, the issue of women’s rights will not play into the article (but only this one time). I’ve done that article before, and there are other reasons I’d never vote for this ticket.
We already have people in government who believe they are above the law (one resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue right now) and it looks like McCain would like to add one more. Initially, Sarah Palin said she would cooperate voluntarily with the ongoing abuse of power investigation against her. Suddenly, the Alaska legislators are under pressure to wait until after the election to continue the investigation, and her husband is now going to ignore the subpoena he has received. I wonder if he’s getting pointers from campaign advisor Karl Rove about how best to ignore a subpoena and get away with it. It doesn’t take much in America these days, particularly if you’re an elected official. We’ve lowered the bar here to the point where we should all be doing the limbo.
McCain campaign spokesman Ed O’Callaghan is falsely accusing the supporters of Barack Obama of controlling the investigation. The fact is that the investigation was recommended prior to Palin’s selection by a bi-partisan Legislative Council, the vast majority of whom were Alaska Republicans. There’s no way this investigation should be delayed until after the election. If McCain chose this woman as a running mate with full knowledge of the accusations against her (and he says he knew from the beginning), then let the chips fall where they may.
McCain wants to distract, not inform. If he distracts, you may not learn that his plan is to privatize and cut Social Security approximately one percent per year, along the lines of the proposed Bush plan. Workers who retire ten years after the McCain plan is put in place would see a ten percent reduction in benefits from the very beginning.
Next on the McCain-Palin hit list is the nation’s health care system. Their plan would effectively dismantle the employer-based coverage that protects most American families by converting health care benefits into income on which employees would have to pay taxes. The idea is to force millions of Americans into the non-group market where costs are high and services are limited. Benefits that millions now have would be lost. This is what the Republicans call the ‘free market’ system, much like the one currently bringing down Wall Street at the taxpayers’ expense.
John McCain’s confusion about who’s who in the world continues to embarrass. This from a candidate supposedly superior to Barack Obama in the foreign policy field. When asked if he would commit to a meeting with Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, McCain refused. Apparently, McCain thought Zapatero was a Latin American autocrat. Randy Scheunemann, McCain’s foreign policy advisor, denied it was yet another McCain gaffe, but rather an intentional policy position with regard to Spain. Why would McCain refuse to commit to a meeting with a Democratic NATO ally with 1,000 troops serving in Afghanistan? Either McCain is intent on hiding his confusion from the public or he is upset (as is President Bush) that Spain pulled its troops from Iraq in 2004. Someone should point out to both George Bush and John McCain that there sometimes are repercussions when other nations find they’ve been deliberately lied to.
Dear Readers,
If the last few days have left you with the same feelings that you had during the run up to the Iraq War you’re definitely not alone.
Remember the WMDs that posed an imminent threat to America?
Remember the statements that implied that the Iraqi oil revenue was going to pay for the war?
Now the Bush Administration and The Fed are saying that we have a financial crisis that needs an immediate $700 billion infusion from the American taxpayer. Did you know that some of that money could be used to bail out foreign owned banks?
Within the next 24 hours, Congress is expected to make an historic choice in addressing America’s financial crisis:
Cut the Bush administration a $700 billion blank check for Wall Street
OR
demand sensible public checks and balances in the $700 billion bailout.
Well, before you let them cut that blank check think about this?
Remember the brave US service men and women who were sent to war in Afghanistan and Iraq without proper body armor.
Remember the appalling conditions at Walter Reed Medical Center.
Remember that the US embassy in Iraq which cost in excess of $600 million to build and is projected to have an annual operating cost of $1.2 billion.
Remember that President Bush vetoed a $35 billion expansion to the SCHIP program which would have provided health insurance to millions of America’s uninsured children. He said that we couldn’t afford it.
Remember the devastation caused by hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and now Ike. There are still parts of New Orleans’ 9th Ward as well as many parishes in Western Louisiana which have yet to have all of the debris removed.
Remember that five years after the worse blackout in US history, the energy grid is still “in dire straits“.
Americans, Get Over The Shock Already!
Are you going to let The Fed, the Bush Administration and Congress rush through a $700 billion dollar bailout of Wall Street and the banking industry when all of the aforementioned have put America and Americans last time after time after time after time?
Now, I’m not saying that nothing needs to be done to fix this broken economy. But are you going to let them rush to a bailout like they rushed to a war?
I just took action with the Campaign for America’s Future to weigh in for common sense solutions. I wanted to urge you to do the same. Please write an emergency letter to Congress now, and tell them: **No $700 Billion blank check to the Bush administration for Wall Street!**
Enough is Enough!
Here is a guest post by community member Deb Della Piana from Turn Left.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
Although the story I’m about to tell you is personal and happened to me and my family, it’s not just my story. It still happens everywhere, everyday. It’s a story of what it’s truly like to be gay in America. I don’t speak much about this these days, but I’m telling it to you today because I fear the country we face under John McCain and Sarah Palin. Under their virulently right-wing rule, this type of disenfranchisement and gutter treatment could spread exponentially throughout this nation.
I once worked for what I believed was one of the best Fortune 500 companies, a company that I had been loyal to since joining them in 1974 and I expected some type of loyalty in return. I was naïve back then. What I have learned is that companies expect loyalty, but they absolutely do not return it at the same level. No company name will be given, but let’s just say that with the advent of some new management came some discrimination. In this case, it was based on my sexual orientation (which, by the way, had not been an issue prior to management change). In 1997, after several ugly encounters between myself and my boss, I was roundly fired.
The circumstances are not important. The fact is that I signed an agreement not to sue (I was stupid, in retrospect) in exchange for a severance package. At the time, I had a small child under a year and a very sick partner, who had contracted pre-eclampsia during the final twenty weeks of the pregnancy and was saddled with a diagnosis of perinatal cardiomyopathy post-pregnancy. I saw no other way to survive and keep them both healthy and safe. One decision I had made, however, was that I would never again give my all to a corporation.
Here is a guest post by community member Claudia.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
Manufacturing terrorism During The Election, Is It Possible?
Yes. I absolutely believe that before the elections this Republican administration will manufacture a terrorism event. I can feel it in my bones. The old boys of the Grand Old Party have one up their sleeve and I think they will spring an attach before the election.
Would you put it past them? Nope, I would not.
These are the same people that told the world Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and was ready to attack the USA. Lies, lies and more lies. Bush and McCain, joined at the hip.
This is what I think they will do, when the polls change and Obama is ahead by a lot, probably a few days or week before the election, they will either stop a huge attack or they will actually kill a few of us to make their point.
I just hope that there is time for the American people to see through their lies and deceit. If Obama takes office he will keep us safe, he will make this country strong, and he will improve our way of life.
Why? Because he will surround himself with people that will make a difference and people that will work for all classes and not just the rich class. One thing I am sure of is that the Obama administration would not manufacture terrorism, and weapons of mass destruction.Why? Because if they get in office they would bring in with them the hope of the country on their shoulders and not arrogance like Bush brought.
Why would anyone believe this administration after it failed us so much?
Here is the ABC Charlie Gibson Interview with Sarah Palin. There is also some fact-checking of this interview by ABC, as well as some pundit reaction. Let me know what you thought about the interview in comments. Do you think Sarah Palin is ready to be V.P. or possibly the president of our country? Are you more or less likely to vote for John McCain with Sarah Palin on the ticket?
Sarah Palin Interview with Charlie Gibson (part one)
Here is a guest post from community member Paula Hall.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
What comes first? I have the power therefore I have the domain? In order to conquer and to prove my power I go to war? Everywhere I hear people talk about war, power and domain. In an election year, after a terrorist attack and the war of Iraq, many still treat these subjects in a scary way.
News, endless interviews, I hear and read all that I can and still don’t get it. Many times and by many people, countries all over the world are taken for granted and sometimes it seems they are treated like our own backyards. The arguments over external politics are most likely to be if we own the world.
What impress me the most is that even after the most horrifying terrorist attack that chocked the Nation and the world and this absurd war, this continues to be the topic on today’s agenda. Only a few are really focusing at home and know how the next commander in chief will be handling subjects like education, health and public safety. On the other hand, it seems everyone have always something to say about Afghanistan, Iran and Iraq.