1 October, 2008 (22:15) | working moms, politics, opinion, election 2008, John McCain, Sarah Palin, video, economy, GOP, Bush, women, Republicans, family planning, feminism, news, youtube, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Are Republicans Turning on Sarah Palin? Should They?
Sarah Palin has had some pretty interesting answers to some seemingly easy questions. [See her interview with Katie Couric here, and the SNL parody here]. Some are questioning her experience, and whether she could be a good president. What do you think? Even some conservatives are beginning to turn on Palin.
Kathleen Parker - Palin Problem…
If at one time women were considered heretical for swimming upstream against feminist orthodoxy, they now face condemnation for swimming downstream — away from Sarah Palin.
Read more »
Comments: 3
29 September, 2008 (22:30) | John McCain, election 2008, working moms, politics, government, roe v. wade, Sarah Palin, video, Barack Obama, pro-choice, opinion, NOW, family planning, women, Republicans, feminism, Colbert, GOP, news, democrats, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Comments: -
28 September, 2008 (22:28) | pro-life, roe v. wade, Sarah Palin, politics, pro-choice, feminism, parenting, family planning | By: Tracy Viselli
Never underestimate the power of women who feel they are targets of campaign condescension. I received an email urging me to donate to Planned Parenthood in Sarah Palin’s name three times over the last two weeks, and that my friends, means it went viral. But just how viral? Almost $1 million dollars worth according to Ben Smith at Politico. Why does Palin inspire such a strong reaction from women who favor choice? Linda Hirschman’s editorial in the Washington Post outlines part of a future that simultaneously inspires fear and fury in women across the country. I’m sure Palin is going to enjoy receiving all of those thank you cards for donations to Planned Parenthood.
Comments: -
26 September, 2008 (13:15) | working moms, politics, opinion, election 2008, John McCain, Barack Obama, family, economy, news, women, debate, family planning, feminism, democrats, healthcare, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Here is a guest post from Penny Ronning at The NonSilent Majority.
(If you would like to be a guest blogger on this site, please join our community)
U.S. Marshall escorting James Meredith to class at Ole Miss in 1962
I will be watching tonight’s debate knowing just how historical this event truly is.
Oh and gee, glad to know John McCain has decided to show.
Yes, the economy is in the toilet. It has been for sometime, Senator McCain.
But
Tonight’s debate and the INCREDIBLE significance of where the debate is taking place has been YEARS in the making and has come at a very high price for many Americans.
The acknowledgment of their sacrifices and their challenges should not be postponed one minute longer.
Segregation was and is horrendous. Why should any American have to fight, be humiliated or denied their right to receive an education based upon race [gender, religious beliefs, or sexual orientation]?
This is a terrible, terrible, unbelievably horrendous mark in American history.
I applaud those that stood up to an unfair system and created a path for either themselves and/or others to change the status quo.
Tonight is significant and I shall be watching.
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2008/sep/14/new-era-takes-root…
Comments: 1
25 September, 2008 (20:53) | working moms, politics, election 2008, Barack Obama, Biden, Sarah Palin, opinion, news, family planning, women, Obama, feminism, democrats, Hillary Clinton, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Here is a guest post from community member Marcia G. Yerman, who also blogs at The Huffington Post.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
New York City – On Sunday, September 21, Women for Obama held a press conference on the steps of City Hall. Arriving early, after navigating the security point guarding the government edifice (referred to by one official as “the house of the people”), I had a chance to interview some of those who had been invited to attend.
In contrast to the narrative that has been promulgated about disgruntled Hillary supporters, the women I conversed with had moved on without trauma. Martha Baker, a consultant on work/family issues, was sporting a button that announced, Hillary Supports Obama, So Do I. “He’s our candidate,” she told me. One of the forces behind the Women For Parity website, which began as “Hillary Voices,” she referenced viewing “the campaigns through a women’s issues prism.”
Carol Greenman, a retired medical administrator and Hillary turned Obama advocate said, “I’m scared to death of another Republican administration.” For her, the major questions were the future of the Supreme Court, and how life would be for her five grandchildren in a country that could be shaped by McCain-Palin ideology.
Grandmothers, ranging in age from 62 – 77, were out in force. Worried about the path that faces the younger generation, members of Grandmothers Against the War and the Granny Peace Brigade were quite vocal about their apprehensions.
Diane Dreyfus, a retired architect and activist (Code Pink) since 2001, was wearing a “We Will Not Be Silent” shirt with Arabic, Hebrew, and English writing. Asked about Sarah Palin she shuddered, “She’s frightening. If she can gut a moose in five seconds, imagine what she can do to health and welfare.”
Actress Kathleen Turner, a featured spokesperson, related to me her commitment to the Obama candidacy. She pronounced her mission as, “Whatever I can do.” Chair of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Board of Advocates, Turner has testified before Congress on Title X (family planning program), and on the Equity of Prescription Insurance Contraception Coverage Act.
Behind those charged with addressing press and supporters, was a phalanx of women with a set of diverse signs…Nurses for Obama, Latinos for Obama, Put Children First, and Don’t Vote Race – Don’t Vote Gender – Vote Intelligence.
Read more »
Comments: -
24 September, 2008 (11:22) | John McCain, family, election 2008, working moms, climate change, government, recession, health, Sarah Palin, foreclosure, money, Barack Obama, politics, military, war, Iraq, law, family planning, Bush, feminism, healthcare, opinion, economy, GOP, news, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Here is a guest post by community member Deb Della Piana from Turn Left.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
It’s election season, and I’m not about to let up on the McCain-Palin ticket. If I put these two at the larval stage, I’m giving them too much credit. To show that I’m not just a one-issue voter when it comes to McCain and Palin, the issue of women’s rights will not play into the article (but only this one time). I’ve done that article before, and there are other reasons I’d never vote for this ticket.
We already have people in government who believe they are above the law (one resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue right now) and it looks like McCain would like to add one more. Initially, Sarah Palin said she would cooperate voluntarily with the ongoing abuse of power investigation against her. Suddenly, the Alaska legislators are under pressure to wait until after the election to continue the investigation, and her husband is now going to ignore the subpoena he has received. I wonder if he’s getting pointers from campaign advisor Karl Rove about how best to ignore a subpoena and get away with it. It doesn’t take much in America these days, particularly if you’re an elected official. We’ve lowered the bar here to the point where we should all be doing the limbo.
McCain campaign spokesman Ed O’Callaghan is falsely accusing the supporters of Barack Obama of controlling the investigation. The fact is that the investigation was recommended prior to Palin’s selection by a bi-partisan Legislative Council, the vast majority of whom were Alaska Republicans. There’s no way this investigation should be delayed until after the election. If McCain chose this woman as a running mate with full knowledge of the accusations against her (and he says he knew from the beginning), then let the chips fall where they may.
McCain wants to distract, not inform. If he distracts, you may not learn that his plan is to privatize and cut Social Security approximately one percent per year, along the lines of the proposed Bush plan. Workers who retire ten years after the McCain plan is put in place would see a ten percent reduction in benefits from the very beginning.
Next on the McCain-Palin hit list is the nation’s health care system. Their plan would effectively dismantle the employer-based coverage that protects most American families by converting health care benefits into income on which employees would have to pay taxes. The idea is to force millions of Americans into the non-group market where costs are high and services are limited. Benefits that millions now have would be lost. This is what the Republicans call the ‘free market’ system, much like the one currently bringing down Wall Street at the taxpayers’ expense.
John McCain’s confusion about who’s who in the world continues to embarrass. This from a candidate supposedly superior to Barack Obama in the foreign policy field. When asked if he would commit to a meeting with Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, McCain refused. Apparently, McCain thought Zapatero was a Latin American autocrat. Randy Scheunemann, McCain’s foreign policy advisor, denied it was yet another McCain gaffe, but rather an intentional policy position with regard to Spain. Why would McCain refuse to commit to a meeting with a Democratic NATO ally with 1,000 troops serving in Afghanistan? Either McCain is intent on hiding his confusion from the public or he is upset (as is President Bush) that Spain pulled its troops from Iraq in 2004. Someone should point out to both George Bush and John McCain that there sometimes are repercussions when other nations find they’ve been deliberately lied to.
Read more »
Comments: -
23 September, 2008 (17:33) | election 2008, family, terrorism, politics, military, government, recession, health, video, education, money, Veterans, opinion, feminism, Iraq, war, family planning, SCHIP, youtube, economy, news, democrats, healthcare, election | By: Pamela Lyn
Dear Readers,
If the last few days have left you with the same feelings that you had during the run up to the Iraq War you’re definitely not alone.
Remember the WMDs that posed an imminent threat to America?
Remember the statements that implied that the Iraqi oil revenue was going to pay for the war?
Now the Bush Administration and The Fed are saying that we have a financial crisis that needs an immediate $700 billion infusion from the American taxpayer. Did you know that some of that money could be used to bail out foreign owned banks?
Within the next 24 hours, Congress is expected to make an historic choice in addressing America’s financial crisis:
Cut the Bush administration a $700 billion blank check for Wall Street
OR
demand sensible public checks and balances in the $700 billion bailout.
Well, before you let them cut that blank check think about this?
Remember the brave US service men and women who were sent to war in Afghanistan and Iraq without proper body armor.
Remember the appalling conditions at Walter Reed Medical Center.
Remember that the US embassy in Iraq which cost in excess of $600 million to build and is projected to have an annual operating cost of $1.2 billion.
Remember that President Bush vetoed a $35 billion expansion to the SCHIP program which would have provided health insurance to millions of America’s uninsured children. He said that we couldn’t afford it.
Remember the devastation caused by hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and now Ike. There are still parts of New Orleans’ 9th Ward as well as many parishes in Western Louisiana which have yet to have all of the debris removed.
Remember that five years after the worse blackout in US history, the energy grid is still “in dire straits“.
Americans, Get Over The Shock Already!
Are you going to let The Fed, the Bush Administration and Congress rush through a $700 billion dollar bailout of Wall Street and the banking industry when all of the aforementioned have put America and Americans last time after time after time after time?
Now, I’m not saying that nothing needs to be done to fix this broken economy. But are you going to let them rush to a bailout like they rushed to a war?
I just took action with the Campaign for America’s Future to weigh in for common sense solutions. I wanted to urge you to do the same. Please write an emergency letter to Congress now, and tell them: **No $700 Billion blank check to the Bush administration for Wall Street!**
Enough is Enough!
Read more »
Comments: -
23 September, 2008 (16:20) | working moms, politics, opinion, election 2008, family, Sarah Palin, mommy bloggers, economy, news, family planning, women, feminism, healthcare, parenting, children, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Here is a guest post from community member Marcia G. Yerman, who also blogs at The Huffington Post.
[If you would like to be a guest blogger on The Political Voices of Women, just join our community, and start posting.]
A “grassroots” letter that will be presented to Sarah Palin by MomsRising is currently on their site, available for signature. To date, 20,000 women’s names have been collected. The question is asked of Palin, “Where do you stand on issues that matter to me?” After extending heartfelt congratulations to the Governor on her path from “PTA to Vice Presidential candidate,” the organization gets down to brass tacks by specifically asking what she and the Republican Party would do for mothers and families.
MomsRising was founded in 2006. It grew out of a book project undertaken by Joan Blade and Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner. Released on Mother’s Day of that year, The Motherhood Manifesto, “explored the struggles of the American family.” It later became a documentary film. Having reached a critical mass with their extensive research data, Blades and Rowe-Finkbeiner decided to mobilize the strength behind mothers’ voices and their concerns.
A non-partisan organization, which works at the state and national level, MomsRising tackles problems that don’t get adequate recognition. Statistics that the public should be aware of are underscored. For example, you may not hear on the campaign trail that 25% of families with children under six live in poverty, single mothers make 60 cents to a man’s dollar, or that 75% of American mothers are in the labor force.
Read more »
Comments: -
23 September, 2008 (02:39) | recession, government, family, John McCain, Barack Obama, money, Sarah Palin, foreclosure, video, election 2008, politics, family planning, Bush, debate, youtube, democrats, opinion, economy, news, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Comments: -
21 September, 2008 (15:55) | election 2008, working moms, pro-choice, opinion, family, roe v. wade, Sarah Palin, video, Barack Obama, news, parenting, family planning, women, Republicans, Obama, feminism, democrats, youtube, Hillary Clinton, election | By: Catherine Morgan
Here is a guest post by community member Zatfig Redhead from The Zatfig Redhead’s Blog
(If you would like to be a guest blogger on this site, please join our community)
Barack Obama has just had a particularly good week with the ladies. In fact, it was a noticeably big week for women’s endorsements for the Obama campaign. Can you say “gender gap?” I knew you could.
In a week that saw Republican VEEP candidate Sarah Palin’s approval rating drop precipitously, these activities aimed at women voters well timed.
First, a group of women’s organizations — those few that have PACs and thus can endorse without jeopardizing their precious non-profit status — endorsed the junior senator from Illinois. Prominently featured was the still-not-as-happy-as-they-could-be NOW, who joined their shero Hillary Clinton in saying “no way, no how, no McCain.” Other groups included the Feminist Majority with the ever colorful Ellie Smeal, the Business & Professional Women/USA, the National Congress of Black Women, and the National Association of Social Workers. Watch portions of the press event here:
But the real coup de grace in my mind was this week’s Obama endorsement from Lilly Ledbetter. The plaintiff of Ledbetter v. Goodyear fame headlined the Democratic National Convention in Denver, and on September 18 made it official — she’s for Obama, in a big way. Ledbetter made the announcement at a series of events in the critical state of Virginia, and was treated like a rock star by adoring crowds. The New York Times has referred to Ledbetter as “the Democrats secret weapon,” and they may be right.
Take a look at this ad featuring Ledbetter, below, just released this past week — she’s a humble grandmother from Alabama who packs a punch, and women nationwide are cheering her on. Why? Because her experiences are so familiar, so universal to us all, and she’s speaking up and trying to change things for future generations — despite the fact that her own case is closed. Now, the Democratic Senate needs to do the right thing by Ledbetter’s vocal support and national advocacy and pass the Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. The House has already passed this critical bill that would right the Supreme Court’s FUBAR handling of the Ledbetter case. However, the legislation is currently stuck in a defacto Senate filibuster on the more pompous, ponderous side of the Hill. But if we can get more Dems elected to the Senate — and inch our way closer to that magic number of 60 — I predict the Ledbetter bill will be one of the first bills signed by an Obama Administration.
Read more »
Comments: 1