Comments on: Was There a “Media Assault” on Hillary Clinton?

By: Lois Hutson

Lois Hutson — Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:30:22 +0000

If seeking the Presidency is about wanting what is best for the whole …. that is to say, the fair representation of all of the people ALL of the people, the goal would be to place a Democratic candidate in office. Anytime a front runner cannot get past his/her/their ego issues … they place all of us in danger of another 4 years of Republican inequity. I have held a high respect for the Clintons, however, it remains to be seen how they go down in my personal history book.

By: Mark Hoefling

Mark Hoefling — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:17:23 +0000

Re: Senator Edwards
From all the news coverage tonight I didn’t hear one word on the question of whether Senator Obama wins the nomination if Senator Edward tells the truth last year when the story broke.
Does anyone really believe that Senator Clinton looses the Iowa caucuses if Senator Edwards is not in the race, especially after the landslide of working class voters who supported Senator Clinton after Senator Edwards left the race?
And what of the value of the Edwards endorsement, the timing of which stepped all over an important moment for Senator Clinton.
So all of the above leads to the question of motive. Was it just revenge for perceived slights during the 2004 campaign? Will some one at least try to find out?
And finally, exactly how hard did the media investigate the Edwards story when it mattered.
I find it hard to believe that if the story was reversed, the “What if” questions and investigation of motive would not have been a center point of the story.
Fraud has been committed against the members of the Democratic Party potentially resulting in an illegitimate nominee. But not one word uttered about it.

By: Randy

Randy — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:13:26 +0000

The fact is that the “unbiased” Media went after Hillary like a pack of wolves!

My fellow Americans, please remember who pays the media’s bills … “large corporations”

The media is a direct reflection of corporate interests. And, Barack Obama is bought and paid for. Look at “all of the flip-flops” by Obama over the last 2 months.

Yeah, the media is guilty of “smear” tactics… no doubt!