Hillary…Don’t Quit!
Who is hurting the Democratic Party more? Obama? Clinton? Or the media? - by Catherine Morgan (cross-posted at the Care2 Election Blog)
Why is the media trying to convince Democrats that if Hillary doesn’t drop out now, it’s the end of the Democratic Party as we know it? The Democratic Party has already, single handedly, ostracized all the voters in Florida and Michigan. Now they want to alienate even more voters, by suggesting that Clinton supporters don’t really matter, and later primary states aren’t relevant to the nomination. As far as I am concerned, the only people hurting the Democratic Party, are the people suggesting Hillary should drop out, as well as the media who are sacrificing their journalistic integrity for sensationalized stories and ratings.
This is from USA Today
Allowing the Democratic presidential race to continue several more weeks will not hurt the party’s chances in November, former president Bill Clinton said Sunday in San Jose, Calif. He urged people to “chill out” and let the balloting run its course.
This is from The Washington Post
THE GROWING chorus among some Democrats and other interested observers for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) to get out of the race for the Democratic Party’s nomination for president is troubling. We’re not promoting Ms. Clinton over Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.), or either of them over Republican Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), for that matter. A time may come when someone should gracefully bow out. But their extended contest informs the electorate and serves to battle-test them both.
From an Associated Press article…
Debra Starks has heard the calls for Hillary Rodham Clinton to quit the presidential race, and she’s not happy about it.
The 53-year old Wal-Mart clerk, so bedecked with Clinton campaign buttons most days that friends call her “Button Lady,” thinks sexism is playing a role in efforts to push the New York senator from the race. Starks wants Clinton to push back.
“The way I look at it, she’s a strong woman and she needs to stay in there. She needs to fight,” Starks said at a Clinton campaign rally. “If you want to be president, you have to fight for what you want. If she stays in there and does what she’s supposed to do, I think she’ll be on her way.”
Amid mounting calls from top Democrats for Clinton to step aside and clear the path for rival Barack Obama, strategists are warning of damage to the party’s chances in November if women — who make up the majority of Democratic voters nationwide, but especially the older, white working-class women who’ve long formed the former first lady’s base — sense a mostly male party establishment is unfairly muscling Clinton out of the race.
From Taylor Marsh
As to whether the Republicans could be picking our nominee, I’ve answered that question before.
It’s really simple. If Michigan and Florida are not counted before the nomination is complete, the Democratic nominee will not be fully legitimate. Obama is giving all Democratic voters, especially Hillary suppporters who are dug in against him, a reason to stay that way. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
Hate to bring up that gender thing again, but here they are:
Senator Patrick Leahy (Elected for life in the 80% Obama state of Vermont, his hemorrhoids are so bad he has to speak in a whisper lest he break out in a cold sweat.)
Senator John Kerry (The quintessential Momma’s boy, our worst candidate since Ohio Governor Cox lost to Warren G. Harding.)
Senator Ted Kennedy (”I knew John Kennedy, Ted, and you’re no John Kennedy.” Got drunk, murdered Mary Jo Kopechne, failed presidential candidate (twice), appointed to a lifetime sentence in the Senate. Everyone leaves when he gives his speeches. Resents the Clintons, especially Hillary.)
Bill Richardson (No more Mr. Nice Guy, Richardson has been viciously biting the hands — Bill’s and Hillary’s — that gave him a career in Washington in Bill Clinton’s Cabinet.)
Howard Dean — (Responsible for the Democratic primary mess that is leaving the voters of Florida and Michigan out in the dark (to Hillary’s disadvantage). Remember, also, that many of his former supporters from Blue State Digital now work for Obama, Kennedy, and Kerry. Remember that “1984″ anti-Hillary video? That came from Blue State Digital. Dean is doing “the right thing” and not letting Florida and Michigan count because it helps Obama. There’s no other reason. The only way those votes will count will be after Dean resigns.
So there you are: the chorus asking Hillary to quit are men with agendas of their own.
From Talk Left
On George Stepanopoulos’ show, Ed Rendell represented the Clinton campaign and John Kerry represented the Obama campaign. Here is the video.
It seems clear that the Obama camp has completely backed down from the “Hillary should quit” campaign. That’s good. Now they are engaging the the winning metrics. Especially the Michigan and Florida issues. Frankly, I think Kerry did as well as he could with a tough hand. Rendell has become quite adept at this though and he talked “popular vote,” the will of the people and MI/FL. For me the Clinton argument is better than the Obama argument.
What do you think? Who is hurting the Democratic Party more? Obama? Clinton? Or the media?
Comments
Comment from PunditMom
Time: April 1, 2008, 2:19 pm
Simple. The media.
Comment from john brown
Time: April 1, 2008, 3:49 pm
Easy. People like you.
Just kidding. The media isn’t doing the D party any favors. However, Hillary Clinton isn’t assisting either. No, not because she won’t yield. That’s fine. No reason she should be REQUIRED to quit. She’s causing damage by the way she campaigns and her Mark Penn (holy crap! he’s a guy)-style candidacy. As long as she’s a poster person for the D party, she’s causing damage. No one with negatives that high helps out all that much.
A few questions…
Would you consider that Minnesota Senator (the one with ovaries) part of the Boys’ Club, too? How about the other superdelegates and plain ol’ folks who happen to think Hillary is a drag and who happen to be women? Do they all just suffer from a case of penis envy or what? I kid, I kid. But you get the idea.
And your supporting sources… USA Today quoting Bill Clinton, who has a real interest in seeing Hillary win, you know… An uncredited WashPost editorial… A 53 year-old Wal-Mart clerk who is known as the button lady–sounds like a Hillary diehard to me… Taylor Marsh, the I paid for my own radio time and flopped so now I can pretend like I’m a talk radio icon person… TalkLeft… Would you bite on a pro-McCain post that cited Cyndi McCain, an uncredited editorial in the National Review, the opinion of a clerk at Wal-Mart who hearts McCain and a few freepers? Thought not.
I think Hillary should stay in. Every day she continues, she damages her brand even more. Maybe she can dissolve into complete irrelevancy by the time we get to Denver.
John Brown
Comment from Catherine Morgan
Time: April 1, 2008, 4:23 pm
Hi “houseonahill” and “punditmom” - Thanks for your comments.
*****
And for “John Brown” - Thanks for your comments, and sorry if my links didn’t live up to your standards. Well, I’m not really “sorry” per say. I do respect your opinion and your right to have it. All sides of the issues are welcome here. However, I’d hate to see what you might have to say about me (and my blog) if you are ever to find a blogger linking to something I’ve written here. ![]()
Pingback from Hillary…Don’t Quit!
Time: April 2, 2008, 11:19 am
[…] 31st, 2008 · No Comments dterry wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptHillary Rodham Clinton (NY) to get […]
Comment from Norma Middleton
Time: May 9, 2008, 10:59 pm
DON’T QUIT, Hillary! It’s too bad that it took the coattails of a cad to start you out on the upward path, but now WE REALLY NEED YOU! You’va spent too much to give up now. The B.H.O. flacks who buzz about your quitting just want to spook you. The disloyal former friends such as the southwestern governors, Arizona governor Janet Napolitano and New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Oklahoma Gov. Brad Henry, and that rat Rahm Emanuel (who would be toiling in obscurity if not for you and your husband) do not impress me by endorsing that wet-behind-the-ears “present” B.H.O, they simply make my opinion of THEM tank.
For me, the endorsers do not influence my view of any candidate, but I do judge the endorsers by my evaluation of the candidate. You are far more worthwhile than your former friends, anyway, even if you do recall sniper fire that wasn’t there. (You still need to explain that bettter!)
Pingback from Edwards finally endorses Obama, Obama calls reporters, and women for Hillary. | Greg Gorbos
Time: May 15, 2008, 8:25 am
[…] Link […]



Comment from Houseonahill
Time: April 1, 2008, 10:02 am
Well said. I think the media is hurting everyone with their polarized viewpoints. In addition, you bring up valid points that no one wants to address, especially about Sen. Ted Kennedy. Furthermore, Obama’s campaign is just a bunch of disheartened Dems who failed at their own presidential attempts and are bitter and want to stick it to the Clintons. Not to mention Obama has been a horrible Senator to my home state of Illinois.
Just check the news and see how much his legislation has helped…how many CPS students have been shot this year???