The Political Voices of Women

Opinion and Commentary of Over 500 Women Political Bloggers

Entries Comments



Outrage Over Air Force Outsourcing

6 March, 2008 (00:24) | Bush, debate, economy, election, government, military, money, news, opinion, politics | By: Catherine Morgan

airbus.jpg

Outrage Over Air Force Outsourcing — Posted by Catherine Morgan (cross-posted at Care2 Election Blog)

The United States Air Force is outsourcing 40,000 jobs, by awarding a $35 billion contract to a European company. What? You have got to be kidding me. More American jobs going to foreign countries?

From The SwampTanker Deal Could Be Campaign Issue

As has been widely reported, the Air Force stunned almost everyone yesterday by deciding to award its huge, $35 billion contract for new airborne refueling tankers to a partnership formed by Northrop Grumman, the Los Angeles-based company, and EADS Inc., the European maker of Airbus airliners.

Boeing, headquartered in Chicago but with a large workforce in Washington State, was the big loser. Boeing had said that if it got the contract to build the new tanker based on its 767 airliner, it would provide enough work to keep 40,000 U.S. workers busy.

But Boeing lost. So the aircraft will be built in Europe, with the conversion work being done in Mobile, Ala. According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the Mobile operations would employ far fewer people than Boeing says it would have, apparently 1,200 to do the modification work.

Gateway Pundit: Outrage!

Over the past few years the Department of Defense has awarded defense contracts to European firms for the Presidential Helicopter, Coast Guard surveillance aircraft, Army helicopters, many other programs and now today the KC-30 tankers.

From Representative Tod Tiahrt – Tanker Outrage

I am outraged by the recent Air Force decision to award the KC-X Next Generation Air-fueling Tanker contract to a foreign competitor in the name of the Northrop Grumman/European Aeronautic Defence and Space Team.

An American tanker should be built by an American company with American workers. America must not outsource its national security. This decision shockingly creates French jobs in place of Kansas jobs. This is unacceptable.

I believe that the Tanker Competition was unfair and poorly evaluated, and if not overturned will negatively impact the United States for generations.

If allowed to stand, this contract award to a foreign company will:

1) Hurt American workers by the loss of U.S. jobs;
2) Outsource an essential military asset to Europe;
3) Force the United States to be dependent upon Europe for our national defense;
4) Result in an inferior tanker for the United States Air Force; and
5) Result in the US being more vulnerable at a time when we must be less vulnerable

I am urging the Air Force to reverse this dangerous decision to award the KC-X Tanker contract to the Northrop Grumman/European Aeronautic Defence and Space Team.

I invite you to take the following survey.

Todd Tiahrt
Member of Congress

Also See:

Wired – What’s Wrong With Our Tanker?

Huffington Post – McCain Still Considering Tanker Deal

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks

Comments

Comment from Shaker
Time: March 6, 2008, 3:56 am

Do you even know the meaning of the word outsourcing? So what if a foreign company won the contract? The defense department should choose you over a foreign company because you belong to my country. Obviously, the bureaucrats involved must have seen the outside provider as a better option.

Comment from Catherine Morgan
Time: March 6, 2008, 11:29 am

Obviously what is happening isn’t “technically” outsourcing…however that doesn’t change the fact that 40,000 people in the United State would have been employed if this contract went to Boeing…but now these jobs will go to other countries.

Comment from Drymartini
Time: March 6, 2008, 11:25 pm

This is ridiculous. Did anyone ever read news any more. some facts.
1) Northrop Grumman is a US company.
2) Both Northrop and Boeing get some parts from overseas.
3) Even if EADS gets the contract, the tanker will be assembled in the US.
4) If the primary criteria of awarding contracts is based on whether you are in the US, then Northrop Grumman/EADS should have been forbidden to bid on the contract RIGHT FROM START. lets get it out in the open. once they are allowed to bid, you cant discriminate against them.
5) Boeing overbid Northrop Grumman’s bid by 40 billion. I am not sure about the exact figure but you can google it easily.
6) if the USAF still went ahead and gave the contract to Boeing here it what it sounds like.
“We dont care how much you charge for it, we are just going to pay.”. sounds like a plan doesnt it!!

Comment from Catherine Morgan
Time: March 7, 2008, 12:15 am

It’s still my opinion, that people in this country need jobs more than the air force needs to get cheap labor overseas. We are spending 275 million dollars each day in Iraq, I find it hard to believe that our military is worrying much about the cost of anything these days.

And if Northrop is a US company, then they should give 40,000 jobs to American workers, as Boeing would have.