<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should BlogHer Interview The Presidential Candidates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/</link>
	<description>Opinion and Commentary of Over 500 Women Political Bloggers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:15:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Pippert</title>
		<link>http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Pippert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I answered the poll. Yes, interview the candidates. Wives are good too, but frankly, I&#039;d like to see SOMEONE ask about domestic, local, and women&#039;s issues and see a candidate answer. Directly.

That they still don&#039;t understand the Internet is a weak excuse. Understanding that  millions of people read a Web site can&#039;t be that hard.

BTW, of ALL the candidates I&#039;ve contacted? ONLY John Edwards has replied.

Julie
&lt;a href=&quot;http://theartfulflower.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Using My Words&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I answered the poll. Yes, interview the candidates. Wives are good too, but frankly, I&#8217;d like to see SOMEONE ask about domestic, local, and women&#8217;s issues and see a candidate answer. Directly.</p>
<p>That they still don&#8217;t understand the Internet is a weak excuse. Understanding that  millions of people read a Web site can&#8217;t be that hard.</p>
<p>BTW, of ALL the candidates I&#8217;ve contacted? ONLY John Edwards has replied.</p>
<p>Julie<br />
<a href="http://theartfulflower.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Using My Words</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Morgan</title>
		<link>http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/#comment-745</guid>
		<description>I agree Jill.  This will be not be just a missed opportunity by any candidate that chooses to over look us...But a missed opportunity that very well may cost the candidate the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Jill.  This will be not be just a missed opportunity by any candidate that chooses to over look us&#8230;But a missed opportunity that very well may cost the candidate the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking, Catherine.  I think there&#039;s a lot more here to be said and discussed.  It&#039;s just not proportionate.  There&#039;s some kind of disconnect.  This isn&#039;t about a group of neighborhood women back in the district or something.  The BlogHer community is really something else entirely - not to mention bigger than pretty much all but the largest cities that will determine who gets electoral votes. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking, Catherine.  I think there&#8217;s a lot more here to be said and discussed.  It&#8217;s just not proportionate.  There&#8217;s some kind of disconnect.  This isn&#8217;t about a group of neighborhood women back in the district or something.  The BlogHer community is really something else entirely &#8211; not to mention bigger than pretty much all but the largest cities that will determine who gets electoral votes. <img src='http://politicsanew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine Morgan</title>
		<link>http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>More stupid than strange if you ask me.  A candidate that doesn&#039;t have women on their side, will not win the campaign.  

Thanks for commenting Larry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More stupid than strange if you ask me.  A candidate that doesn&#8217;t have women on their side, will not win the campaign.  </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting Larry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicsanew.com/2007/12/12/should-blogher-interview-the-presidential-candidates/#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Strange they would rather go it alone than cooperate with an established group to promote their cause and reach those that probably wouldn&#039;t view their sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange they would rather go it alone than cooperate with an established group to promote their cause and reach those that probably wouldn&#8217;t view their sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
